Hello, world! So as you may have already guessed from the title, this blog will be devoted to showing passport chops and immigration paraphernalia. Not much to say or show, is there? Well, you may be surprised. While I will try my best to post my personal passport chops and passport chops only, I will from time to time come up with posts on things that may interest those others out there to read my blog. I really am not writing this for anyone but myself as who would be so interested in immigration law, passport stamps, and visas as I am?

I'm pretty sure that most will not find this blog very interesting, but I do hope that there is a readership out there as enthusiastic as I am about immigration, passports, and visas.

Happy viewing!

martes, 22 de marzo de 2011

Singapore

Singapore, an island nation, is known for being a city-state. While Singapore lays claim on a total of sixty-three islands (most of them tiny and unpopulated), the large majority of the country is found on a relatively tiny island (officially called Pulau Ujong) which measures 704 km2. For an Asian Tiger with a booming economy and a per capita GDP that matches many Western, First World countries, it is surprising that Singapore is so small in size!

Perhaps due to its burgeoning economic activity and the plethora of people commuting into and out of Singapore, despite its small size, Singapore has many points of entry. According to the Singapore Immigration and Checkpoints Authority, Singapore has the following checkpoints:

Air Checkpoints
» Changi Airport
» Seletar Airport

Air Cargo Checkpoints
» Airport Logistics Park
» Changi Airfreight Centre
» Parcel Post Section

Coastal Checkpoints
» Singapore Cruise Centre
» Tanah Merah Ferry Terminal
» Changi Ferry Terminal
» Jurong Fishery Port
» Marina South Pier
» West Coast Pier

Land Checkpoints
» Tuas Checkpoint
» Woodlands Checkpoint
» Woodlands Train Checkpoint

Ports Checkpoints
» Ports Command HQ
» Brani Gate
» Jurong Port Main Gate
» Jurong Scanning Station
» Jurong West Gate
» Keppel Distripark
» Pasir Panjang Terminal Gate 4
» Pasir Panjang Scanning Station
» Tanjong Pagar Gate
» Tanjong Pagar Scanning Station
» Sembawang Gate

I suppose that most of these are not open to civilians and that many of the ones listed above (such as the Air Cargo and especially "Ports Checkpoints" are only for transporting goods). To my knowledge, there are seven points of entry and exit that can be used by civilians:

Changi Airport
Tuas Checkpoint
Woodlands Checkpoint
Woodlands Train Checkpoint
Singapore Cruise Center
Tanah Merah Ferry Terminal
Changi Ferry Terminal

Of these seven, I have used four. Here are my immigrations stamps from Singapore (not including two more which are unintelligible except for the dates):

This first one from 2007 is an excellent stamp; it is clear enough that you can read the permit message: "Permitted to enter and remain in Singapore for ninety days for Social Visit only from date shown above." Most Western passport holders get 90 days while most Asian passport holders get 30 days. This was applied at the Singapore airport.

This was my first passport stamp from a country other than the US, Canada, the Philippines, and Korea (although the Korea ones were just transit stamps - I didn't spend more than 24 hours there).

Exit stamps from the Woodlands ("W") train checkpoint. I also have one from the Woodlands pedestrian checkpoint, but it is heavy and not very nice, so I did not include it in this post. Anyway, it also uses "W" as its checkpoint code, so you can't really tell the difference unless you know the story (as in my case) or you have access to Singapore's archives and can check where the immigration officers were posted that day (using their officer numbers).

This is a Woodlands entry stamp which is generic in the sense that the number of days you are permitted to stay is written in by the officer rather than incorporated into the stamp design. Perhaps this generic one was issued to make it more convenient for the immigration officers; instead of switching from 30-day to 90-day stamps when processing different passports, they can just easily write down the number of days. Strangely, though, the others who were with me when I made the crossing (and they also hold US passports) received chops with "90 days" already on the stamper..... I do not recall, though, if they got rectangular stamps (like this one), hexagon stamps (like the ones for 90-day permits), or round edge rectangular stamps (like the one shown below, used for 30-day permits).

The stamp above is not very clear, but it gives you an example of how the 30-day rounded-edge permits look - quite similar to the 30-day entry stamps of Indonesia. This one was applied into my Philippine passport. This was applied at Terminal 1 of Changi airport.


One of the benefits of the Philippine passports is that it does not have images for its background designs on each page, so stamps can be seen more clearly. This stamp above is very sharp and clear and was applied at Changi airport Terminal 1. Perhaps the reason it is very sharp is because it is the stamp used by the immigration "station" and not the immigration counters. This is because the immigration officer escorted me to the special immigration station since he has a problem with the fact that my passport was due to expire in less than six months and I was not heading for my "home country." I explained to them that I was a permanent resident in Macau and that I was flying back via Penang. The officer at the immigration station consulted their superior who replied something along the lines of, "Well, he's leaving Singapore, so it doesn't matter." After that, the rather rotund Indian-looking lady applied this stamp on my passport very clearly. It is probably sharp because, unlike the others, it is not used on so many passports.

The episode was a bit humiliating, however, because I was a Filipino passport holder being held at immigration and the first question that one of the staff asked the one escorting me was, "Overstayed?" Ironically, this was the second time I was held at immigration in less than two weeks! The first time I was ever "detained" was while crossing the Gongbei border crossing on the Macau side, but that anecdote is for the post on Macau.


This is a stamp from Tuas checkpoint. I had to manipulate the image a bit to make it clearer since the boat in the background has such a complicated design that it makes the stamp (which is actually a bit darker in reality) difficult to read. You can, however, make out the big "T" for "Tuas."


Unlike in 2007, this time the immigration officer at Woodlands used the 90-day hexagon on my passport. This may have been because I asked him to stamp clearly for a "souvenir" and so he thought it would be best to use the right stamp rather than write in the number of days permit. This officer was the first I have encountered who as very meticulous about his work. The process was very slow and he made sure to check my information page thoroughly and even looked through all my visa pages. When he finished processing me (after he had already stamped the passport), he gave the thing one more hard look before returning it. I am not complaining, but I was just a bit surprised. Many other immigration officers in this region (especially in thoroughly used border checkpoints like Gongbei in Macau and KLIA-LCCT in Kuala Lumpur) seem like they couldn't really care less. Perhaps there is a negative correlation between frequency of use of a checkpoint and thoroughness in checking (of not-so-exotic passports)?

The departure stamp is, like the one last time, very clean and sharp. It was applied by an elderly, rotund Chinese officer, whom I asked to please stamp my passport clearly. She did stamp clearly, but on top of the entry stamp, so it's not as "clear" as I would like it.

The next time I visit Singapore, I really want to take a ferry to Malaysia from Changi Ferry terminal, where I believe the checkpoint code is an "R." There are few ferries that operate there, and they are quite small 12-seaters that leave only when full (!).

domingo, 20 de marzo de 2011

Doing the In-Out, In-Out through Malaysia

Malaysia is a country that I have visited often, not only in transit (with Air Asia), but also out of interest for the many cultural heritage sites and natural wonders it has to offer. I have been to Penang, Kuala Lumpur, Johot Bahru, Melaka, Kuching, Labuan, and Kota Kinabalu. Because of all these trips, I have been able to amass a collection of different immigration endorsements from many different entry points in Malaysia over the past few years. From my many visits, I have come to learn that Malaysian immigration has some quirks to it, especially when traveling to and from Sarawak in East Malaysia as well as traveling by train from Singapore.

I am very proud of this collection an present it here in chronological order.


This was the first Malaysian immigration that I have ever received and it is in my third US passport (I am now on the fourth one). What is cool about this one is that the checkpoint "Johor Bahru" no longer exists as it was replaced by the new Sultan Iskandar Checkpoint in December of 2008. More information on this new checkpoint from this Wikipedia page. Fortunately, I also have a clear chop from the new checkpoint, which I received during my trip to Melaka a few days ago.

From what I remember of the old checkpoint, I can say that this new one is a MAJOR improvement. The old one was small, a bit dirty, and not air-conditioned and the immigration counters and facilities were not impressive. Some of them used computer monitors which looked like they were from the early 90s, and I wouldn't be surprised if they were.

The new one is huge, air-conditioned, and the largest checkpoint of its kind in Malaysia. It is very impressive and is comparable to the one found on the Singapore side of the causeway - if not better! I guess Malaysia is leveling up and showing the world (most especially Singapore, I suspect) that it can meet first-world, international standards and that it is indeed capable of providing modern, high-tech services and facilities. I am not sure how it is in other government offices, but certainly this and all the other checkpoints I have gone through are impressive and world-class.
What is cool about these two immigration stamps is that they weren't planned. It's just that I had some time to kill and so I decided that I might go to the Woodlands checkpoint and have my passport stamped for my collection of passport chops. It's great that this spur-of-the-moment decision to make the short "visa run" gave me the opportunity to have an entry stamp that reads "Johor Bahru," especially considering that the next time I entered Malaysia was by train and they do not apply any stamps when you clear immigration there.

Some more information on this strange arrangement, from Wikipedia:

Since 1992, KTM has worked with Singapore on re-aligning its railway tracks at Woodlands when Singapore built a new immigration checkpoint there to replace the old checkpoint, and with new facilities to carry out train passengers' immigration clearance at the point of entry into Singapore rather than at Tanjong Pagar. In 1993, Malaysia responded that it would transfer its CIQ operations to the new Woodlands checkpoint.

However, in June 1997, Malaysia stated that the Malaysia-Singapore Points of Agreement of 1990 would come into effect only after it decided to relocate Tanjong Pagar station. Malaysia also informed Singapore that it had changed its mind and decided not to co-locate its CIQ with Singapore's at Woodlands Train Checkpoint (WTCP) but to remain at Tanjong Pagar. In April 1998, Singapore informed Malaysia that it would be moving its CIQ operations to Woodlands while Malaysia would have to move its CIQ out of Singapore from 1 August 1998. Malaysia requested, instead, that space be made available at the WTCP, as an interim arrangement, for Malaysian Immigration officials to operate from there and thereby overcome the problem of sequence of exit and entry stampings by Singapore and Malaysia immigration authorities.

According to a press release from the Ministry of Home Affairs of Singapore dated 24 July 1998:

  • Singapore will allow Malaysian customs officials to operate at Tanjong Pagar railway station. Singapore officials will be present at Tanjong Pagar railway station to lend their authority to Malaysian customs officials during the interim period.
  • Singapore has agreed to Malaysia's request to allow Malaysian Immigration to put some desks for its immigration officers on the passenger platform at WTCP to clear passengers after Singapore has cleared them for exit from Singapore. Singapore Immigration must clear departing passengers for exit from Singapore before Malaysian Immigration clears them for entry into Malaysia. Otherwise, the sequence of immigration clearance will be illogical and it will cause problems in crime investigation and prosecution. These interim arrangements will overcome the problems which would be caused if Malaysian Immigration were to remain in Tanjong Pagar railway station.

However, Malaysia refused to have its immigration clearance on the passenger platform: they insisted that Malaysian Immigration should be inside the building at WTCP. If this was not possible, they said that Malaysian Immigration would remain at Tanjong Pagar. Singapore argued that Malaysia's decision to locate its Immigration Control Post in Singapore is not in compliance with Malaysia's own law. Under Malaysian law, it is Johor Bahru railway station, not Tanjong Pagar, that is gazetted as an Immigration Control Post for persons travelling by train from Singapore to Malaysia. Singapore also pointed out that this was confirmed by the endorsement on the passports of passengers boarding the train at Tanjong Pagar, which showed:

"MALAYSIA IMMIGRATION
JOHOR BAHRU
SOCIAL/BUSINESS VISIT PASS
Reg. 11. Imm. Regs 63
[Date]"
Permitted to enter and remain in West Malaysia and Sabah for one month from the date shown above"

On 1 August 1998, Singaporean Immigration ceased operations in Tanjong Pagar and moved to WTCP while Malaysian Immigration continued operating in Tanjong Pagar. Malaysia decided not to endorse the passports of outgoing rail passengers from Singapore and promised to provide legal arguments to show that Malaysia's CIQ has the legal right to stay at Tanjong Pagar.

The immigration clearance procedure which resulted from the impasse, and which is currently being practised until railway and CIQ operations cease by 1 July 2011, is:

  • Towards Singapore, Malaysian immigration officers carry out immigration clearance on board the train at Johor Bahru railway station. After clearing immigration, the train crosses the causeway and stops at WTCP, where all passengers must proceed to Singapore Customs and Immigration. Therefore, travellers entering Singapore by rail are following the correct order of immigration clearance, that is, exit granted by Malaysian Immigration in Johor and entry granted by Singapore Immigration in Woodlands. After clearing immigration at Woodlands, passengers may disembark or continue their journey to Tanjong Pagar by train.
  • Towards Malaysia, passengers must board the train at Tanjong Pagar and clear Malaysian Customs and Immigration before boarding. The train travels about 30 minutes to WTCP and stops for another 30 minutes to allow sufficient time for passengers to clear Singapore Immigration. In this case, passengers are granted entry into Malaysia before clearing Singapore Immigration, which is contrary to international practice. To circumvent this problem, Malaysian immigration officers do not stamp on passengers' passports.

In early 2007, news of a Singaporean woman being jailed for failing to have her passport stamped when entering Malaysia threw the spotlight on the unusual clearance procedures when travelling by train. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs reminded Singaporeans that their passports will not be stamped when departing for Malaysia by train, but will instead obtain a stamp on the disembarkation card, which must be retained until departure from Malaysia. The entry records are also entered into a computer system. Even then, this arrangement continued to present problems for some commuters.


Above is my departure endorsement at Kuala Lumpur airport at the end of the trip. The immigration officer penned in Malay "Masuk melalui KTM [Keretapi Tanah Melayu, tr. Malaysian Railways] Tg. [Tanjong] Pagar pd [pada] 24/5/07," which means "Entered through KTM Tanjong Pagar on 24/5/07." Perhaps the Malaysian immigration officers are used to this or have been made aware of this because we were not asked any questions as to why we had no entry stamps. But it was really cool having our entry information handwritten, like in old times.

This is the first of many entry stamps I would receive at the Kuala Lumpur LCCT (Low Cost Carrier Terminal). It was applied while I was in transit to Cambodia. If you are familiar with the new US passports, then you would see that this is on a passport different from the ones above. Notice that the checkpoint code is a "B." I believe that the endorsements at the Kuala Lumpur airport (the nice, big one) have a code of "A." I hope to one day also have an endorsement with a nice "A" on it.


Here is another sample of a Kuala Lumpur airport "B" departure stamp.This stamp applied at the Penang airport is found on my first Philippine passport, and it is quite interesting because there is a handwritten annotation that reads "Less Than 6 Month [sic]." This is because that passport was to expire in March of 2011 and usually immigration authorities do not let you enter if your passport is valid for less than six months. Fortunately, as I was just in transit to Macau, the rather rotund immigration lady let me through and simply wrote in the annotation above after consulting the immigration officer next to her in the same booth. The strange thing is that I cleared immigration at the same airport not more than a week earlier and there was absolutely no problem, and that time I was not in transit - I was actually there to spend 3 nights in Penang! Also notice that Philippine passport holders are granted only 30 days on social visit while US (and most other Western) passport holders are granted 90 days.

The reason why I decided to use my Philippine passport was because my exit stamps from Macau was in that passport as my residence permit to Macau was in that passport as well. I wanted to have Penang airport stamps in my two passports and since I was going on a short trip to Singapore from Penang, I would have to clear Malaysian immigration again en route to Macau. So I thought that it would be great because I could just switch passports from Singapore to Penang. That didn't happen because I had to leave my US passport in Penang for Thai visa processing, which is a better deal since (1) I get a free Thai visa, (2) I got the special 6-month annotation, and (3) because the Philippine passport has not messy-looking background images, the Penang stamps I have are very clear.

Here is my first entry stamp from the Kota Kinabalu International Airport. On this trip, I cleared immigration at this airport twice (I went to Brunei and returned to this airport before returning to the Philippines), and twice were the chops unclear and very light, so much so that they might fade just like the chop I received in Niagara Falls in 2004. I suppose that the "S/V" written at the top stands for "Social Visit." Also, the date was written in hand in the space below, unlike inmost other chops which have 30 or 90 days already written on them.


Here is a sample of a Kota Kinabalu airport exit stamp.


This was applied while I was on another "visa run" (just because I wanted an endorsement from a different checkpoint), this time from the Tedungan checkpoint in Sarawk, which is on the Brunei-Malaysia border. Notice how this one reads "Permitted to enter and remain in Sarawak/Malaysia" while the previous ones all read "Permitted to enter and remain in West Malaysia and Sabah." More on that later.

Also interesting about this chop is that it grants a stay of only 30 days (although I was in and out of Malaysia in less than 30 minutes). This is probably because the lady at the immigration checkpoint expected only to receive ASEAN passports at her checkpoint. This is because I noticed that many of the pedestrians who cross this border are actually workers in Brunei who want to extend their stay in Brunei by clearing immigration again and receiving another 30-day permit for Brunei (or maybe they are required to exit Brunei every once in a while even if they have legitimate papers?). At any rate, perhaps the lady was too tired to bring out the 90-day chop and so she just used this one.

It was also surprising that we were no longer required to fill in an entry form. It was convenient at the time, but in retrospect, I think it was not a very good idea as exiting Malaysia might have been made difficult if we did not have the departure card. Then again, perhaps the lady could feel that we would exit from the same port and the officer on the other side could just walk over to her and consult her personally about the matter, should a problem arise.

No problems came up and we were given an exit stamp from Tedungan with no questions asked.

This immigration endorsement is from Kuching international airport, in the Malaysian state of Sarawak. It wouldn't be strange for me to have this stamp had I flown in from another country, but I was actually flying in from the neighboring Malaysian state of Sabah (these two states are located in the north of Borneo, which is known as East Malaysia or Malaysian Borneo. This is why some guidebooks sometimes specify "Peninsular Malaysia" when referring to the Western half of Malaysia.)

Kuching and Sabah are peculiar in that, when it comes to immigration matters, they have their own policies as though they were different countries from Malaysia! Even Malaysian coming in from West Malaysia and Sabah have to go through a checkpoint so that they could enter!

Here is some information from Wikipedia:

Residency in the states of Sabah and Sarawak are distinct from the other 11 states. While Sabah and Sarawak each has autonomy in immigration affairs (which includes imposing immigration restrictions on Peninsular Malaysia residents), residents of Sabah and Sarawak are exempted from the immigration controls of their own states. A Malaysian citizen born to a Sabah or Sarawak resident would have Sabah or Sarawak residency, regardless of where the person was born. Birth in Sabah or Sarawak alone does not make a person a resident unless one of his/her parents is a resident. A person may become a Sabah or Sarawak resident by obtaining Permanent Residence (PR) status issued by the respective state immigration departments. The residency status of a person is indicated by a letter on his/her MyKad below the photo, with, "H" for Sabahans, "K" for Sarawakians and none for Peninsular Malaysians.

Above is the immigration endorsement I received when I land in Kota Kinabalu airport (Sabah) on a flight from Kuching airport (Sarawak), which are both in Malaysia.

Here is another Tedungan entry stamp, this time on a Philippine passport (my second one) and with the correct stay permit of 30 days.

The immigration endorsement above is very interesting an unique in the sense that it is a "transfer endorsement" to transfer my exit stamp from my Philippine passport to my US one. This is because I wanted to get a Brunei stamp on my Philippine passport, so I decided to do what I usually do and switch passports while crossing borders. Malaysian immigration, from experience, is rather lax when it comes to switching passports and I have done it a number of times.

But Brunei immigration is not as lenient. I exited Brunei with my US passport and then entered Sarawak, Malaysia, on my Philippine passport so that I could show my immigration exit stamps from Malaysia to the Brunei officers and make them less suspicious. The immigration officer on the Malaysian side was a bit iffy to let me in on my Philippine passport at first, but I convinced him by telling him I had switched passports before and after checking with his superiors, he endorsed my Philippine passport. He was actually very friendly and accommodating, not really the serious type. I even noticed when I passed through that he was playing Warcraft on his computer!

Exiting was no problem either. But when I got back to the Brunei side, they asked why there were no previous Brunei endorsements on my Philippine passport when there were Tedungan endorsements. I tried explaining that I wanted to enter with my Philippine passport, but a senior-looking officer said that they did not allow people to enter Brunei on different passports. I wonder if this was just a twist of fate and if I would have cleared immigration in Brunei had the senior officer not been there.

At any rate, I was made to walk back to the Tedungan side to ask them to transfer my Malaysian exit stamp to my US passport. Thankfully, the Warcraft officer was good-natured and did not mind my disturbing him with my strange requests. He brought me into a back room where his superiors were and consulted them about my situation. The superiors seemed to be having lunch or some snack as it was about noon at that time. Perhaps they really did not care too much or maybe my US passport kept them from flaming up in fury that I was bothering them with strange situations, but the superiors seemed to just wave it off and instructed the Warcraft guy to escort me to the rotund (and jolly-looking) exit officer (there are about five immigration counters, but only one immigration official on both the entry and exit sides).

Fortunately, both were good-natured and the rotund and jolly exit officer did not hesitate to cross out my exit stamp and write "VOID" over it and then stamp my US passport and write "Transfer endosement [sic] from Philipino [sic] passport (XX0000000)." It's cool to have these special endorsements as they have cool stories behind them.

This is my entry stamp from the Sultan Abu Bakar checkpoint, a "new"checkpoint opened in 1998 to ease traffic on the Woodlands causeway by attracting private vehicles with its smoother and faster procedures. More information on this can be found here. I was completely unaware before my trip to Melaka just a few days ago and the fact that our bus went through this checkpoint was a pleasant surprise as it gave me the opportunity to add a new checkpoint stamp to both my Malaysia and Singapore "collections."


This last stamp from Malaysia (at least for now) was also a pleasant surprise as I was expecting to cross the border again at Sultan Abu Bakar and Tuas, but the bus driver for some reason instead chose to go through the old Johor Bahru-Woodlands causeway. Because of that, I now have a stamp from the "new" Johor Bahru checkpoint opened in 2008.

What a coincidence that the first and last stamps on this post are from Johor Bahru!

A Second Time in Cambodia

It sure has been quite some time since I last posted an entry in this blog! I just read through the last one I made and noticed that it was posted a few days shy of a year ago! Well, anyway, I'll pick up from where I left off. The last time I posted an entry, I showed my Cambodian visa issued in Hong Kong and mentioned that I would be going on a second trip to Cambodia in October 2010. Well, here is the visa issued in Manila for that trip.


Unlike the one issued in five minutes in Hong Kong, this one took two or three days to process. I do not know why there is such a big difference in the time it takes to process visas, but I have a feeling that it is because the Filipino way of doing things is a long process that involves lots of paperwork and waiting for those "special people" who would sign the paperwork. I suppose the Cambodian embassy here has adopted this heavily red-taped system and so that is why I had to visit the embassy in Makati twice.

The requirements for a visa, however, are not too many. There is no website for the embassy in Manila where the requirements are listed, but I think I called in and remember that all I needed was the application form and one (or two?) passport pictures and, of course, the USD20 fee (which can only be paid in US Dollars and not in Philippine Pesos). There was no need to present an onward ticket or anything like that. What I also found interesting was the fact that they did not charge more than the official rate for a visa. Unlike in Hong Kong where they collect HKD200 (which is about USD25), here they collect exactly USD20. Perhaps that's the trade-off for the slower service they offer in Manila?

The embassy is located in an old building whose architecture suggests that it was built in the 1960s or 1970s. If my memory serves me right, it was a pyramid-shaped building made of concrete mixed in with shells or pebbles. I noticed this type of concrete-shell-pebble mix from old buildings built during the Marcos era. Although I do not know what it is called, I gather it was popular in its day as many contemporary buildings also had this type of finishing. Faura Hall and the ISO buildings on the Ateneo de Manila Loyola Heights campus are examples.

A funny thing that happened when I came in the first time was that the guard at the entrance (where you have to sign in a logbook) asked me if I was Cambodian.... do I look like a typical Cambodian? Not to seem condescending, but frankly speaking, I really do not think so.

The chops for this trip to Cambodia can be seen on the opposite page, along with the chops from other places I visited on the same trip, Thailand and Malaysia. The Thai stamps are unspectacular, heavy, and unclear. Perhaps this is because many travelers are processed in Bangkok and so the rubber on the stamps are easily worn. However, I believe that the Singapore airport processes many more passengers than the Bangkok airport, but the chops applied there are often very clear (at least on my passports). Maybe the Thai immigration authority uses stamps with lower quality rubber, or maybe they replace the stamps less often than their Singaporean counterpart?

Thai visas are not required for US citizens for a stay of up to thirty days, so it means that I would normally not be able to apply for a visa unless I planned a long-term stay in Thailand (and could prove it with confirmed tickets). However, when I visited Penang, Malaysia, in November of 2009, there were signs everywhere that said long-term visas to Thailand were being issued free and all that you would need to pay was the agent's fee of five ringgit (less that USD2) and you would have a visa in two-three days. Apparently, this was a move made by the Thai government to boost the tourism industry, which at the time was slowing down thanks to the political turmoil in the country.

Note that the seal of the Thai Consulate at Penang is also heavy and quite unclear. Perhaps it is because there were so many applications for the free visas?

The visa fee at the time was THB 1900 (about USD 55+), but this was waived for a period of time until March 2010 or so. Practically speaking, most Western passport holders visiting Thailand would not be greatly affected by this new scheme as 30-day stay permits are issued at airports and 15-day permits at land crossings. However, the Chinese, who make up a sizable portion of the Thai tourism industry, may be enticed by the free visa and may have taken that into consideration when deciding on where to go for vacation (I gather that Chinese passport holders need visas for almost everywhere; see here). For more information on the free Thailand visas, you may check this link, although there is no use anymore as the offer for the free visas has expired.

The immigration endorsements at the bottom of the page are from Malaysia, from which I have many stamps from many different checkpoints, which I will discuss in a later post.